Digital forensics expert & expert witness · The Forbes digital forensics columnist
Digital forensics explained on camera, in minutes: deepfakes, cell phone evidence and what holds up in court.
Cellebrite’s 2026 Industry Trends Report found that 97% of investigators now identify smartphones as their primary source of digital evidence. The report surveyed 1,200 practitioners in 63 countries. Two years ago that figure was 73%. If you’re an attorney who hasn’t had to grapple with cell phone e
A claims adjuster reviews damage photos. A detective examines cell phone video. A family law attorney presents screenshots in a custody hearing. None of them can confirm with certainty that what they're looking at is real.
Rented a car. Took a picture of it in the lot. Totally clean. Uploaded that photo to Grok and told it to add damage. 30 seconds.
AI “unmasking” images of the Minneapolis ICE shooter are forgeries, not enhancements.
Video evidence can only be enhanced so much - too much and you create artifacts that do not exist in the original footage.
Digital evidence is volatile and fragile. Volatile, meaning easily changed. Fragile, meaning easily destroyed. Your case is only as good as your collection. Fail to respect this truth and risk losing before it begins.
Trucking Attorneys: Inferior cell phone extractions = inferior results. Don't let technical negligence destroy your trucking litigation strategy.
AI evidence, deepfakes and cell phone forensics from an expert witness who works these cases. No hype, no fear-mongering. Free.
Check your inbox to confirm your subscription.